Wednesday, September 5, 2012


The Importance of Examinations

The learning systems at a University must include an evaluation sub-system. The evaluation sub-system must be fair and transparent so that the  world may be able to use the evaluation by the University with confidence. 
The evaluation system also provides a control and feedback mechanism for the learning systems of the University.

But the evaluation system  must not override the learning system. For example  an electric meter in a home is used for measurement of the electrical energy used in the home. However the energy used in the meter must be negligible as compared to the energy it measures.
At Universities in South Asia, the examination systems use up so much of time and energy of the students, faculty members and the College and University officers that at every University, the learning system seems to have become a sub-system while the evaluation system has become the main system.

All the stake-holders in the institutions of higher education  have to understand that the institutions are to primarily provide systems of learning to the society. The libraries, class-rooms, laboratories and workshops are places of learning. New knowledge for the world is created, when the faculty members and students become immersed in the processes of learning at these places.  At the end of the semester, examinations are supposed to evaluate how well the learning systems have worked. But examination system is not the main objective for an institution of higher education’s existence.
 GTU has used technology to create an objective and fair administrative system for examinations.  The paper-setters are requested to provide an Assessment Chart so that the faculty members from all over the state should be able to provide  a similar and fair assessment to all.

GTU processes the results within three days of receipt of the assessed answer-books from the examiners. If every  administrator at every College and every faculty member were to do his/ her part of the job with sincerity, the system can work so well that no student or faculty member would have any complaint whatsoever.
We want every student to use only fair means during examinations. So like every University, GTU has a  high-power Unfair Means (UFM) Committee to consider all cases of use of unfair means, reported by the supervisors. In India, GTU is the only University, which has recently established a Committee to consider the cases of any inappropriate or insincere work by faculty members, while doing the assessment.   

Let us all join hands to make our learning systems the best and let us make our examination system totally fair and transparent. 

 

Other happenings at GTU:
Visit of Dr. Bill Damachia, Director, Transnational Education & Alliances, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia

2 comments:

  1. As with multitude of businesses in our country , what we lack is the stringent and appropriate implementation of enacted regulations . Many a times I have been witness to the procedures adopted by checkers to the evaluation of our examination papers and felt pity to the way our future being handled for a few bucks each just for the getting done wit the task imposed .

    We as students are aware of the problems pertaining to scanty staff , inundating strength in colleges , tight time schedules , woes of placements and financial constrains of the University .

    But I am highly optimistic of the progress OUR university has made though the times , I have myself as a student been part of the transformation from its inception and have high anticipation that with the current wave of innovative and refreshing changes to the system to continue , GTU surely will rank amongst the Best Universities of the country very soon and we as students shall be proud of it .

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks.
    If we continue to work with sincerity and optimism, we shall be able to induce, nudge, motivate and force our system to move continuously towards improvement. I think we have already succeeded in many ways in reducing the problems by facing them head-on, whenever these occur. GTU pays more for evaluating every answer-script than any other University. Our faculty members are human beings and if we continue to remind them that the task of evaluation is a sacred duty and that it has to be done sincerely, it should help. GTU is detrmined to openly face every failure, which is detected. It will not push any such issue under the rug. Thanks

    ReplyDelete